[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110307130332.GA10777@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:03:32 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: roland@...hat.com, jan.kratochvil@...hat.com,
vda.linux@...glemail.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
indan@....nu
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] ptrace,signal: group stop / ptrace updates, take#2
On 03/05, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> This patchset contains the following ten patches.
>
> 0001-signal-fix-SIGCONT-notification-code.patch
> 0002-ptrace-remove-the-extra-wake_up_state-from-ptrace_de.patch
> 0003-signal-remove-superflous-try_to_freeze-loop-in-do_si.patch
> 0004-ptrace-kill-tracehook_notify_jctl.patch
> 0005-ptrace-add-why-to-ptrace_stop.patch
> 0006-signal-fix-premature-completion-of-group-stop-when-i.patch
> 0007-signal-use-GROUP_STOP_PENDING-to-stop-once-for-a-sin.patch
> 0008-ptrace-participate-in-group-stop-from-ptrace_stop-if.patch
> 0009-ptrace-make-do_signal_stop-use-ptrace_stop-if-the-ta.patch
> 0010-ptrace-clean-transitions-between-TASK_STOPPED-and-TR.patch
>
> In light of the proposal, this patchset can be separated into two
> parts. The first part, patches 0001 through 0006, tightens various
> loose ends and prepare for further changes. Except for 0004, every
> patch is acked by Oleg and/or Roland. 0004 doesn't cause any behavior
> change and removes a tracehook for future changes.
>
> The second part, 0007-0010, fixes group stop participation accounting
> and make tracees always stop in TASK_TRACED instead of TASK_STOPPED.
> IOW, it implements "P1. Always TASK_TRACED while ptraced" of the
> proposal.
Looks like, we already discussed these changes? I mean, at first
glance the only difference (compared to the previous series) is that
10/10 simplifies the usage of task_clear_group_stop_trapping().
In this case please free to add my reviewed-by or acked-by.
> Roland, Oleg, Andrew, if there's no objection, I'd like to set up a
> git tree to route further developments in the area. We're going to
> see a lot of patches and it's simply much more efficient to have a
> dedicated stable git branch.
Agreed.
> I don't really care who controls the tree and don't intend to commit
> any patch without Oleg's Acked-by so it would make most sense for Oleg
> to control the branch but, if Oleg dosnn't want to, I'd be happy to do
> it. No matter who does it, let's _PLEASE_ establish a stable tree.
>
> This patchset is available in the following git branch.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git ptrace-review
Thanks!
As for "who controls" I do not care too. But I think I should help you
as much as I can. I'll contact you in a few days to discuss this, but
let me repeat once again: whatever you prefer is fine for me.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists