linux-kernel - Re: Undefined TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iwlwifi: move rx handlers code to iwl-rx.c)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110307131217.GA9571@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:12:17 +0100
From:	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Daniel Halperin <dhalperi@...washington.edu>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@...el.com>,
	Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Undefined TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iwlwifi: move
 rx handlers code to iwl-rx.c)

On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:20:02AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 09:12 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > 
> > But perhaps we need a more generic fix in wait.h for the future. Maybe
> > we should decouple definitions of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE and friends from
> > sched.h into separate header and include that header in wait.h as
> > well?
> 
> No! That only makes the mess worse, the only sane option is to fix
> things so that wait.h can include sched.h and that is non-trivial.

I was not aware of recent discussion
http://marc.info/?t=129829886000004&r=1&w=2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/