[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1299489602.2308.1.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 10:20:02 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Cc: Daniel Halperin <dhalperi@...washington.edu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@...el.com>,
Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Undefined TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iwlwifi:
move rx handlers code to iwl-rx.c)
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 09:12 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>
> But perhaps we need a more generic fix in wait.h for the future. Maybe
> we should decouple definitions of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE and friends from
> sched.h into separate header and include that header in wait.h as
> well?
No! That only makes the mess worse, the only sane option is to fix
things so that wait.h can include sched.h and that is non-trivial.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists