[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikxbAfpHCWzvLscdHccOju=Q1tN0pvcu_=jbeQ_@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 13:43:31 +0800
From: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: + sysctl-add-proc_dointvec_unsigned-handler.patch added to -mm tree
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:05:43PM -0800, akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
>>> Add a proc_dointvec_unsigned() sysctl handler for positive value cases.
>>
>>> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c~sysctl-add-proc_dointvec_unsigned-handler
>>> +++ a/kernel/sysctl.c
>>
>>> +int proc_dointvec_unsigned(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>>> + void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
>>> +{
>>> + struct do_proc_dointvec_minmax_conv_param param = {
>>> + .min = &zero,
>>> + };
>>> + return do_proc_dointvec(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos,
>>> + do_proc_dointvec_minmax_conv, ¶m);
>>> +}
>>
>> This silently ignored max value in .extra2 .
>
> Hi,
>
> Good cache, should set .max = NULL here
Oh, c99 set default value to 0, isn't it?
What do you mean silently ignore here?
Let's see the code:
if ((param->min && *param->min > val) ||
(param->max && *param->max < val))
return -EINVAL;
There's no problem max == NULL
--
Regards
dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists