[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110309140610.GB20188@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:06:10 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, phan@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf,top: fix events overflow in top command
Em Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 10:59:25AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 09:13:40PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > The snprintf function returns number of printed characters even
> > if it cross the size parameter. So passing enough events via '-e'
> > parameter will cause segmentation fault.
> >
> > It's reproduced by following command:
> >
> > perf top -e `perf list | grep Tracepoint | awk -F'[' '\
> > {gsub(/[[:space:]]+/,"",$1);array[FNR]=$1}END{outputs=array[1];\
> > for (i=2;i<=FNR;i++){ outputs=outputs "," array[i];};print outputs}'`
> >
> > Attached patch is adding SNPRINTF macro that provides the
> > overflow check and returns actuall number of printed characters.
>
> Good catch, applying to perf/urgent.
Tried but it doesn't apply nor can I reproduce the overflow (albeit
granted the long line of events is annoying).
So I'm applying both patches to perf/core instead.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists