linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf,top: fix events overflow in top command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110309141910.GB1929@jolsa.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:19:10 +0100
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Cc:	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, phan@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf,top: fix events overflow in top command

On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:06:10AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 10:59:25AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 09:13:40PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > The snprintf function returns number of printed characters even
> > > if it cross the size parameter. So passing enough events via '-e'
> > > parameter will cause segmentation fault.
> > > 
> > > It's reproduced by following command:
> > > 
> > > perf top -e `perf list | grep Tracepoint | awk -F'[' '\
> > > {gsub(/[[:space:]]+/,"",$1);array[FNR]=$1}END{outputs=array[1];\
> > > for (i=2;i<=FNR;i++){ outputs=outputs "," array[i];};print outputs}'`
> > > 
> > > Attached patch is adding SNPRINTF macro that provides the
> > > overflow check and returns actuall number of printed characters.
> > 
> > Good catch, applying to perf/urgent.
> 
> Tried but it doesn't apply nor can I reproduce the overflow (albeit
> granted the long line of events is annoying).

patches were based on tip tree

hm, it crashes for me on tip tree,
but I haven't checked the perf/core tree..

not sure if it's any help, but while debugging I could see the sigsegv happened
when the pointer was far beyond the 160 chars buffer size,
maybe the buffer got bigger in the perf tree..

jirka

> 
> So I'm applying both patches to perf/core instead.
> 
> - Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/