[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D77F149.8020906@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:29:45 -0500
From: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>
To: Nikola Ciprich <extmaillist@...uxbox.cz>
CC: KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add missing guest clock update removed by e48672fa25e879f7ae21785c7efd187738139593
On 03/09/2011 02:30 PM, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
>> Can you try moving the kvm_make_request() inside the if conditional and
>> see if it that also fixes it?
>>
> yes, changing to:
> if (unlikely(vcpu->cpu != cpu) || check_tsc_unstable()) {
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu);
> /* Make sure TSC doesn't go backwards */
> s64 tsc_delta = !vcpu->arch.last_host_tsc ? 0 :
>
> is also OK.
>
> what about changing:
> if (check_tsc_unstable()) {
> kvm_x86_ops->adjust_tsc_offset(vcpu, -tsc_delta);
> vcpu->arch.tsc_catchup = 1;
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu);
> }
>
> to:
>
> if (check_tsc_unstable()) {
> kvm_x86_ops->adjust_tsc_offset(vcpu, -tsc_delta);
> vcpu->arch.tsc_catchup = 1;
> }
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu);
>
> this fixes thinks for me as well..
> n.
> ?
>
Can you send a patch which does that? I think this is the correct fix.
Thanks,
Zach
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists