linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Remove the pm_message

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110310205008.GB7750@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:50:09 -0500
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Remove the pm_message_t argument from driver
 suspend

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:13:05PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
 > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
 > 
 > None of the existing cpufreq drivers uses the second argument of
 > its .suspend() callback (which isn't useful anyway), so remove it.
 > 
 > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
 > ---
 > 
 > Hi,
 > 
 > This patch is requisite for sysdevs rework discussed here:
 > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/9/439
 > Please apply or let me know if I can take it to the suspend tree.

Looks ok to me.

applied and queued for .39

thanks,

	Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/