linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Remove the pm_message

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201103112131.47862.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:31:47 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc:	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Remove the pm_message_t argument from driver suspend

On Thursday, March 10, 2011, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:13:05PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>  > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
>  > 
>  > None of the existing cpufreq drivers uses the second argument of
>  > its .suspend() callback (which isn't useful anyway), so remove it.
>  > 
>  > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
>  > ---
>  > 
>  > Hi,
>  > 
>  > This patch is requisite for sysdevs rework discussed here:
>  > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/9/439
>  > Please apply or let me know if I can take it to the suspend tree.
> 
> Looks ok to me.
> 
> applied and queued for .39

Thanks!

Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/