linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] jump label: update for .39

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP58EC26791F850066BFEAE996C80@phx.gbl>
Date:	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:22:14 -0500
From:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC:	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
	hpa@...or.com, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
	andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com, rth@...hat.com,
	masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
	avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, sam@...nborg.org,
	michael@...erman.id.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] jump label: update for .39

* Steven Rostedt (rostedt@...dmis.org) wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 14:25 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 10:57 -0800, David Daney wrote:
> > > On 03/10/2011 10:53 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 10:47 -0800, David Daney wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> The alignment requested by the assembler will have to satisfy *all* the
> > > >> requested alignments, so manually forcing everything to .align 8 (or
> > > >> .align 4 for 32-bit) should ensure that the linker doesn't put in any holes.
> > > >
> > > > I would agree with the assessment although, I don't know that it is
> > > > documented anywhere that this is what happens. As the previous "bug"
> > > > with the trace_events was solved by me adding .align(4) everywhere, I
> > > > would think that .align(sizeof(long)) would work here too.
> > > >
> > > > It may be a good ideal to force this alignment, and not add wasted
> > > > space. If anything, if this (hypothetical) bug appears, it will most
> > > > likely show up as a crash on boot up. I'm not too concerned about it.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > If the linker put in gratuitous holes, things like  __ex_table would 
> > > break too.
> > 
> > Again, as I have said (although I said extable not __ex_table), there
> > seems to be no problem when the data is of a power of 2 as well. As
> > __ex_table size is a power of 2. We just don't know if the linker will
> > add holes when the size is something other than power of 2.
> 
> Anyway, I think the best thing for now is to have Jason add
> the .align(sizeof(long)) in the inline assembly for all locations and be
> done with it.

You seem to be contradicting yourself here. I'm concerned about having
"structures" of a size not power of two. Can we simply either

- Add a padding element at the end
or
- use .align 4*sizeof(long) at the beginning

to make sure the linker won't put any holes when it puts objects 
together ?

Thanks,

Mathieu

> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/