linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] jump label: introduce static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110310211801.GB4058@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:18:01 -0500
From:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, andi@...stfloor.org,
	roland@...hat.com, rth@...hat.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
	fweisbec@...il.com, avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	sam@...nborg.org, ddaney@...iumnetworks.com,
	michael@...erman.id.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] jump label: introduce static_branch() interface

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 04:01:35PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 15:47 -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c b/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
> > index 961b6b3..dfa4c3c 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
> > @@ -4,13 +4,13 @@
> >   * Copyright (C) 2009 Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
> >   *
> >   */
> > -#include <linux/jump_label.h>
> >  #include <linux/memory.h>
> >  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/list.h>
> >  #include <linux/jhash.h>
> >  #include <linux/cpu.h>
> > +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
> >  #include <asm/kprobes.h>
> >  #include <asm/alternative.h>
> >  
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/module.c b/arch/x86/kernel/module.c
> 
> Jason,
> 
> I'm curious, is there a reason for this header change? Clean up? Maybe
> it could go into a separate patch. If anything, just to make this one
> slightly smaller.
> 

hmm...I did that to get types.h for the new atomic_t usage.

However, now that I look at it again its bogus. The right fix is to
explicitly include <linux/types.h> from jump_label.h.

-Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/