[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110311020234.GA24634@linux-mips.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 03:02:34 +0100
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, peterz@...radead.org,
hpa@...or.com, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, mingo@...e.hu,
tglx@...utronix.de, andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com,
rth@...hat.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
sam@...nborg.org, ddaney@...iumnetworks.com,
michael@...erman.id.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] jump label: introduce static_branch() interface
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 04:18:01PM -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> > I'm curious, is there a reason for this header change? Clean up? Maybe
> > it could go into a separate patch. If anything, just to make this one
> > slightly smaller.
> >
>
> hmm...I did that to get types.h for the new atomic_t usage.
>
> However, now that I look at it again its bogus. The right fix is to
> explicitly include <linux/types.h> from jump_label.h.
And <linux/compiler.h> for unlikely().
Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists