[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201103111554.38487.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:54:38 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@...esas.com>,
gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tty: serial: Use hub6_serial_X when CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_HUB6 is defined
On Friday 11 March 2011, Alan Cox wrote:
> > or some variation of this. It's fine as long as this code never gets
> > called, but incorrect nonetheless.
>
> I disagree - the WARN(1) is certainly correct.
Yes. I wrote this before I saw your other reply where you suggest
the use of WARN_ON().
So while technically correct, I still tend to prefer build warnings
over run-time warnings for things that we know about at build time.
> > I think it would be much cleaner if architectures that cannot do this
> > would not have to define those functions and we could make sure that
> > all drivers that do inb() have correct Kconfig dependencies.
>
> For 8250 the way to do that is to remove all the switches and port type
> stuff and propogate to setting ->serial_in and ->serial_out rather than
> splattering the code with ifdefs. At that point you'd have a "lib8250" or
> similar and an 8250_io/pci driver.
Right, this absolutely makes sense. It's a lot more work than the originally
suggested patch, but the result is much cleaner.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists