linux-kernel - Re: [RESOLVED] Re: Second drive on VT6421

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m3pqpw1226.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
Date:	Sat, 12 Mar 2011 22:06:25 +0100
From:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To:	Philippe LeCavalier <support@...cavalier.com>
Cc:	Alejandro Riveira Fernández <ariveira@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESOLVED] Re: Second drive on VT6421

Philippe LeCavalier <support@...cavalier.com> writes:

> There must be something about that chip...Perhaps the way the firmware
> allocates the bandwidth. ie 2 channels with a total of 3Gbps then a
> second drive cannot coexists if the first requests all 3Gbps?!

I think VT6421(A) is 1.5 Gb/s only.
To be honest, It was never able to get it to work reliably, esp. with
Transcend and/or Kingston SSDs.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/