lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 21:16:26 -0500 From: Philippe LeCavalier <support@...cavalier.com> To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl> Cc: Alejandro Riveira Fernández <ariveira@...il.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [RESOLVED] Re: Second drive on VT6421 Excerpts from Krzysztof Halasa's message of Sat Mar 12 16:06:25 -0500 2011: > Philippe LeCavalier <support@...cavalier.com> writes: > > > There must be something about that chip...Perhaps the way the firmware > > allocates the bandwidth. ie 2 channels with a total of 3Gbps then a > > second drive cannot coexists if the first requests all 3Gbps?! > > I think VT6421(A) is 1.5 Gb/s only. > To be honest, It was never able to get it to work reliably, esp. with > Transcend and/or Kingston SSDs. I'm confident you're right. I just haven't come across any doc outlining that. Since I resolved this, the drives have been running stable no issues at all. -- Thanks, Phil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists