[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110312041729.GB15526@home.goodmis.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:17:29 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Justin TerAvest <teravest@...gle.com>
Cc: jaxboe@...ionio.com, vgoyal@...hat.com, ctalbott@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add unaccounted time to timeslice_used.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 01:06:12PM -0800, Justin TerAvest wrote:
> There are two kind of times that tasks are not charged for: the first
> seek and the extra time slice used over the allocated timeslice. Both
> of these exported as a new unaccounted_time stat.
>
> I think it would be good to have this reported in 'time' as well, but
> that is probably a separate discussion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin TerAvest <teravest@...gle.com>
> ---
> block/blk-cgroup.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> block/blk-cgroup.h | 12 ++++++++++--
> block/cfq-iosched.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
> block/cfq.h | 6 +++---
> 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Hi! Just an FYI, could you add what subsystem you are changing into the
subject. Like:
[PATCH] block: Add unaccounted time to timeslice_used
Otherwise, the subject looks like it's modifying the kernel internal time
source.
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists