[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201103131608.14914.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:08:14 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...e.de>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] timekeeping: Use syscore_ops instead of sysdev class and sysdev
On Sunday, March 13, 2011, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Mar 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> >
> > The timekeeping subsystem uses a sysdev class and a sysdev for
> > executing timekeeping_suspend() after interrupts have been turned off
> > on the boot CPU (during system suspend) and for executing
> > timekeeping_resume() before turning on interrupts on the boot CPU
> > (during system resume). However, since both of these functions
> > ignore their arguments, the entire mechanism may be replaced with a
> > struct syscore_ops object which is simpler.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Thanks!
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists