[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110314121321.GE23257@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:13:21 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...hat.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, binutils@...rceware.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alan Modra <amodra@...il.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Add --size-check=[error|warning]
* Andreas Schwab <schwab@...hat.com> wrote:
> Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org> writes:
>
> > Hi Andreas,
> >
> > Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org> writes:
> >>> So what do you suggest that testers who want to, say, build old Linux
> >>> kernel versions with new binutils do?
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@...hat.com> wrote:
> >> The same that testers have to do in order to build old Linux kernel
> >> versions with current versions of make.
> >
> > Are you saying it's OK to screw over binutils users because GNU Make
> > did that too?
>
> I'm just telling you the facts.
And you are wrong - latest Make does not break reasonably old kernel builds such as
v2.6.30.
Latest binutils insta-breaks the build over 130,000 commits, including the latest
released kernel.
Please change that .size build error to a build warning, to avoid this unnecessary
collateral damage.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists