[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3bp1dvp3l.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:55:10 +0100
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, binutils@...rceware.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alan Modra <amodra@...il.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Add --size-check=[error|warning]
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> writes:
> * Andreas Schwab <schwab@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org> writes:
>>
>> > Hi Andreas,
>> >
>> > Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org> writes:
>> >>> So what do you suggest that testers who want to, say, build old Linux
>> >>> kernel versions with new binutils do?
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@...hat.com> wrote:
>> >> The same that testers have to do in order to build old Linux kernel
>> >> versions with current versions of make.
>> >
>> > Are you saying it's OK to screw over binutils users because GNU Make
>> > did that too?
>>
>> I'm just telling you the facts.
>
> And you are wrong
This is just ridiculous. You are defining away facts just because they
don't fit your view.
> latest Make does not break reasonably old kernel builds such as
> v2.6.30.
$ git tag --contains 3c955b4 | head -1
v2.6.36
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@...hat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists