linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Re: 2.6.38 regression caused by commit 415e12b

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201103150102.58126.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 01:02:57 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Ozan Caglayan <ozan@...dus.org.tr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Re: 2.6.38 regression caused by commit 415e12b

On Tuesday, March 15, 2011, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 09:32:35PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > I don't understand why pci_no_msi_support() is called on your system even
> > though pci=nomsi is not in the kernel command line.
> > 
> > Please apply this patch on top of the previous two and send me dmesg.
> 
> Ok, here's the dmesg with your two previous patches applied, plus the
> patch below.  I don't see any stack trace though.

The MSI patch would have worked if that had been the case.

Evidently, the check against ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT fails, but I'm not sure why.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/