[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1300262357.2250.58.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 08:59:17 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, acme@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf probe: Clean up probe_point_lazy_walker()
return value
On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 23:18 +0000, tip-bot for Ingo Molnar wrote:
> perf probe: Clean up probe_point_lazy_walker() return value
> --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> @@ -1328,7 +1328,7 @@ static int probe_point_lazy_walker(const char *fname, int lineno,
> * Continue if no error, because the lazy pattern will match
> * to other lines
> */
> - return ret < 0 ?: 0;
> + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> }
It is a slight change in semantics though, the return value will now be
negative instead of 1. If its used as a boolean that's fine, but still.
I'd have changed it to:
return ret < 0;
Which is identical to the previous statement.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists