[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinvRJNZGrKT0pbFBcHoe2LOeSVMd2CEBaKdbU2u@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 08:03:42 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
warns@...-sense.de
Subject: Re: Alpha no longer recognises certain partition tables (v2.6.38)
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz> wrote:
>
> OK, I've fallen for that and created too many partitions on my system disk.
> When using your patch dmesg reports:
>
> [ 7.511714] sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] 2930277168 512-byte logical blocks: (1.50
> TB/1.36 TiB)
> [ 7.551753] sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
> [ 7.572261] sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
> [ 7.591792] sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled,
> doesn't support DPO or FUA
> [ 7.633785] OSF: 10 partitions
> [ 7.654292] sdb: sdb1 sdb2 sdb3 sdb4 sdb5 sdb6 sdb7 sdb8
> [ 7.675777] sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk
Ok, no problem.
I'll increase the value of OSF_MAX_PARTITIONS to 18 (which is what
fits in a 512 byte sector), and mark it for back-porting into stable
too.
Thanks for testing.
> I could get it back to eight partitions but it will require copying the
> largest partition to another disk and back again as that partition does not
> meet the conditions for resizing.
Oh, no need for that. There really isn't any real technical limit for
the "limit to 8 partitions", and we don't cause regressions.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists