[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110316150450.GO31407@erda.amd.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:04:51 +0100
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net" <oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oprofile: Allow setting EDGE/INV/CMASK for Intel
counter events
On 11.03.11 14:12:28, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> For some performance events it's useful to set the EDGE and INV
> bits and the CMASK mask in the counter control register. The list
> of predefined events Intel releases for each CPU has some events which
> require these settings to get more "natural" to use higher level events.
>
> oprofile currently doesn't allow this.
>
> This patch adds new extra configuration fields for them, so that
> they can be specified in oprofilefs.
>
> An updated oprofile daemon can then make use of this to set them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c | 4 ++++
> arch/x86/oprofile/op_counter.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
> index e2b7b0c..bace252 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ u64 op_x86_get_ctrl(struct op_x86_model_spec const *model,
> val |= counter_config->user ? ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_USR : 0;
> val |= counter_config->kernel ? ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_OS : 0;
> val |= (counter_config->unit_mask & 0xFF) << 8;
> + val |= counter_config->extra & (ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_INV|
> + ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EDGE|
> + ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_CMASK);
I would like to write the actual value back so that userland may read
it:
counter_config->extra &= (ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_INV|
ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EDGE|
ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_CMASK);
val |= counter_config->extra;
The value will not be updated emmediately but at least after profiling
was started.
As an alternative, maybe we better put this extra bits in the
unit_mask, e.g. in bits [31:16] of the unit mask for bits [31:16] of
PerfEvtSel? Then, we simply could use the current userland to set it
up.
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists