[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D81E64F.2020909@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:45:35 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: David Woodhouse <david.woodhouse@...el.com>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jarkko Lavinen <jarkko.lavinen@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
On 2011-03-17 11:36, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 10:18 +0000, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>
>> Can you point me at the commit in question? Generally,
>> elv_queue_empty()
>> can be replaced by blk_peek_request().
>
> The interesting commit is this one:
> http://git.infradead.org/mtd-2.6.git/commitdiff/c7519dbf6
>
> The point of it is to enable this
> http://git.infradead.org/mtd-2.6.git/commitdiff/a32159024
OK, can you commit a change just changing that to blk_peek_request()?
That'll avoid the conflict.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists