lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D81E64F.2020909@kernel.dk>
Date:	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:45:35 +0100
From:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:	David Woodhouse <david.woodhouse@...el.com>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jarkko Lavinen <jarkko.lavinen@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree

On 2011-03-17 11:36, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 10:18 +0000, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>
>> Can you point me at the commit in question? Generally,
>> elv_queue_empty()
>> can be replaced by blk_peek_request(). 
> 
> The interesting commit is this one:
> http://git.infradead.org/mtd-2.6.git/commitdiff/c7519dbf6
> 
> The point of it is to enable this
> http://git.infradead.org/mtd-2.6.git/commitdiff/a32159024

OK, can you commit a change just changing that to blk_peek_request()?
That'll avoid the conflict.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ