[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110322103300.c934a540.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:33:00 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Woodhouse <david.woodhouse@...el.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jarkko Lavinen <jarkko.lavinen@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
Hi Guys,
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:45:35 +0100 Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>
> On 2011-03-17 11:36, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 10:18 +0000, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>
> >> Can you point me at the commit in question? Generally,
> >> elv_queue_empty()
> >> can be replaced by blk_peek_request().
> >
> > The interesting commit is this one:
> > http://git.infradead.org/mtd-2.6.git/commitdiff/c7519dbf6
> >
> > The point of it is to enable this
> > http://git.infradead.org/mtd-2.6.git/commitdiff/a32159024
>
> OK, can you commit a change just changing that to blk_peek_request()?
> That'll avoid the conflict.
I am still reverting those three commits from the mtd tree ... David, I
assume that you are going to want to ask Linus to merge the mtd tree at
some point soon?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists