linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Utilize the PCI API in the TTM framework.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1300713067.8042.13.camel@thor.local>
Date:	Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:11:07 +0100
From:	Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, thomas@...pmail.org,
	airlied@...ux.ie, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, konrad@...nok.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Utilize the PCI API in the TTM framework.

On Fre, 2011-01-07 at 12:11 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: 
> 
> 1) The 'NULL' when doing dma_alloc_coherent is unsightly. I was toying
> with modifying the TTM API to pass in 'struct device' or 'struct pci_device'
> but figured it would make first sense to get your guys input before heading that route.

It's worse than unsightly: It breaks TTM on PPC. See
arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h: get_dma_ops() returns NULL if
NULL is passed in for the device, and most of its callers BUG in that
case. The exception being dma_supported(), so a possible solution might
be to use that for checking if dma_alloc_coherent can be used.

Dave, please prevent this change from entering mainline before there's a
solution for this.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer           |                http://www.vmware.com
Libre software enthusiast         |          Debian, X and DRI developer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/