[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0CE8B6BE3C4AD74AB97D9D29BD24E55201A5897F@CORPEXCH1.na.ads.idt.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:15:33 -0700
From: "Bounine, Alexandre" <Alexandre.Bounine@....com>
To: "Dan Carpenter" <error27@...il.com>
Cc: "Matt Porter" <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [patch] rapidio: potential null deref on failure path
In this case I agree.
Do you want me to move this patch up or you have your own path for it?
Alex.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:error27@...il.com]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 11:00 AM
To: Bounine, Alexandre
Cc: Matt Porter; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] rapidio: potential null deref on failure path
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 05:49:06AM -0700, Bounine, Alexandre wrote:
> Better to combine both conditions:
>
> if (rio_is_switch(rdev) && rswitch->route_table))
> kfree(rswitch->route_table);
>
> Because there is situation when routine fails to allocate route_table
> for a switch.
>
kfree() accepts NULL pointers. People have been removing these checks
all over the tree by the hundreds... Sorry I should have mentioned
that.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists