linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D871EF2.7010801@kernel.dk>
Date:	Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:48:34 +0100
From:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree

On 2011-03-21 01:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in fs/super.c
> between commit 9d412a43c3b2 ("vfs: split off vfsmount-related parts of
> vfs_kern_mount()") from Linus' tree and commit 95f28604a65b ("fs: assign
> sb->s_bdi to default_backing_dev_info if the bdi is going away") from the
> block tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.

Thanks Stephen, your fixup is (obviously) correct.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/