[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinmAJsXy=iJ5Fq-+CLTAGXTtLGhULRUf=Q1rkY1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:21:18 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH][RFC][resend] CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE should default to N
Hi Jesper,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> wrote:
> I believe that the majority of systems we are built on want a -O2 compiled
> kernel. Optimizing for size (-Os) is mainly benneficial for embedded
> systems and systems with very small CPU caches (correct me if I'm wrong).
Please take a look at commit 0910b44 ("Expose "Optimize for size"
option for everybody") for the reasoning behind defaulting to -Os.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists