lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110322025232.GL14675@home.goodmis.org>
Date:	Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:52:32 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH][RFC][resend] CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE should default to N

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:08:24PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> I believe that the majority of systems we are built on want a -O2 compiled 
> kernel. Optimizing for size (-Os) is mainly benneficial for embedded 
> systems and systems with very small CPU caches (correct me if I'm wrong).
> So it seems wrong to me that CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE defaults to 'y' and 
> recommends saying 'Y' if unsure. I believe it should default to 'n' and 
> recommend that if unsure. People who bennefit from -Os know who they are 
> and can enable the option if needed/wanted - the majority shouldn't 
> select this. Right?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>

I've actually seen nothing but problems with -Os.

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ