| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1300762892.3616.12.camel@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:01:32 +0800 From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ACPI, APEI patches for 2.6.39 Hi, Andrew, On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 08:01 +0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 05:51:24PM -0500, Len Brown wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Huang Ying wrote: > > > > > [PATCH 1/7] Add Kconfig option ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG > > > [PATCH 2/7] lib, Add lock-less NULL terminated single list > > > [PATCH 3/7] ACPI, APEI, Add ERST record ID cache > > > [PATCH 4/7] PCIe, AER, use pre-generated prefix in error information printing > > > [PATCH 5/7] ACPI, APEI, Add PCIe AER error information printing support > > > [PATCH 6/7] lib, Make gen_pool memory allocator lockless > > > [PATCH 7/7] ACPI, APEI, GHES, printk support for recoverable error via NMI > > > > I've put this series into acpi-test, so it will be visible in linux-next; > > but I'm not the right person to review the generic lockless stuff, > > who is? > > I reviewed it earlier and it seemed good to me (unless it has > changed), but Linus wanted non Intel reviewers too. Any takers? As for [PATCH 1/7] Add Kconfig option ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG [PATCH 2/7] lib, Add lock-less NULL terminated single list [PATCH 6/7] lib, Make gen_pool memory allocator lockless they are general kernel patches. I remember you have reviewed some earlier version of these patches, and merged 1/2 into -mm tree. Do you have time to review these patches? Although Andi has reviewed them, we really need some non-Intel reviewers. Thanks, Huang Ying b -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists