linux-kernel - Re: RFC: Platform data for onboard USB assets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:03:39 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	andy.green@...aro.org
Cc:	Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
	Linux USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, arnd@...db.de,
	broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, roger.quadros@...ia.com,
	greg@...ah.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Platform data for onboard USB assets

On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 22:37 +0000, Andy Green wrote:
> > that a device-tree based approach is much better in the long run
> (and
> > more flexible) despite Andy odd quasi-religious aversion for it.
> 
> As Mark Brown wrote earlier about this, the Device Tree
> "implementation 
> just isn't there in mainline".

Right and will take even longer to get there as long as short sighted
people like yourself appear to run some kind of religious battle against
it for no good technical reason that I can fathom so far.

Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/