[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110323120044.bb8c0ae1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:00:44 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Trinabh Gupta <trinabh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: arjan@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org, lenb@...nel.org,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
venki@...gle.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V4 1/5] cpuidle: Remove pm_idle pointer for x86
Hi,
Just some simple comments.
Does having this patch first in the series break APM idle?
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:02:27 +0530 Trinabh Gupta <trinabh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
> index 8d12878..17b7101 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
> @@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ static inline void play_dead(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> +extern void cpuidle_idle_call(void);
Put this declaration in a header file and include that header file here
and in the file that defines that function.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists