[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110323100707.GC2297@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:07:07 +0100
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] checkpatch: add option to change warning return value.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 04:13:10PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> There are a lot of warnings in checkpatch.pl that are rather subjective.
> For instance, when a line is 81 characters long, and the patch submitter
> is just cleaning up existing code, a maintainer may not care that
> checkpatch.pl warns about the over 80-character line. It should be up to
> the maintainer what warnings they want to pay attention to.
>
> Unfortunately, if you try to run checkpatch.pl as part of a git pre-commit
> hook and a patch in a series being applied by git-am fails checkpatch.pl,
> the whole process stops. At that point I usually end up just disabling
> that git hook, which means I don't see real errors in the patches.
>
> Add an option to checkpatch.pl to print the warnings, but not return an
> error code when the --lazy flag is present. (Anyone with a better name
> can pipe up, lazy just seemed to be the opposite to strict.) This allows
> the maintainer to view the warnings, but still allow the patch application
> process to continue.
I first thought you would add code that allowed turning only select
errors into warnings.
If you just want to have git continue in any case, why not append
'|| true' to the line that invokes checkpatch in your hook script?
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists