[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D8B4A6F.9040303@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:43:11 -0400
From: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>
To: Valerie Aurora <valerie.aurora@...il.com>, miklos@...redi.hu
CC: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Union mounts comparison with overlay file system prototype?
On 03/22/2011 10:12 PM, Valerie Aurora wrote:
> And I cc'd linux@...r.kernel.org on all the patches instead of
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org - guess I'm really out of the kernel
> business now! Anyway, if you want your replies to go to lkml, you'll
> have to hand edit the cc list.
>
> -VAL
>
Val, Miklos,
Can one or both of you summarize what we union mounts and overlay do better or
worse? Do we need both or just one?
Thanks!
Ric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists