[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110324154010.GA863@xanatos>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:40:10 -0700
From: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] checkpatch: add option to change warning return value.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 09:41:17PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 04:22:46PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > > @@ -1096,6 +1099,9 @@ sub report {
> > >
> > > push(our @report, $line);
> > >
> > > + if ($lazy == 1) {
> > > + return 0;
> > > + }
> > > return 1;
> > > }
> > > sub report_dump {
>
> Instead of this hunk, have:
>
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 58848e3..54ec3d9 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ for my $filename (@ARGV) {
> }
> close($FILE);
> if (!process($filename)) {
> - $exit = 1;
> + $exit = 1 if (!$lazy);
> }
> @rawlines = ();
> @lines = ();
Hmm, but isn't that going to skip returning an exit value if there's an
error as well? I really do want it to fail if there's an error, just
not if there's a warning.
Sarah Sharp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists