[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1103241150210.2006-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:52:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <mnazarewicz@...gle.com>
cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: core: Change usb_create_sysfs_intf_files()' return
type to void
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
>
> The usb_create_sysfs_intf_files() function always returned zero even
> if it failed to create sysfs fails. Since this is a desired behaviour
> there is no need to return return code at all. This commit changes
> function's return type (form int) to void.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/core/sysfs.c | 7 +++----
> drivers/usb/core/usb.c | 3 +--
> drivers/usb/core/usb.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> The below patch has not been tested (not even compiled), just a quick scatch.
If you had compiled it, you would have seen why it's not a good idea to
remove retval. :-)
On the other hand, changing the function's return type to void is okay.
I think the reason it returns int is historical; there used to be a
failure mode but it got removed.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists