linux-kernel - Re: intel_ips produces constant load of 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110325112443.7caf4429@jbarnes-desktop>
Date:	Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:24:43 -0700
From:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To:	Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@...enet.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: intel_ips produces constant load of 1

On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:23:15 +0100
Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@...enet.de> wrote:

> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:04:04 -0700
> > Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> wrote:
> > 
> >>> ps aux | grep ips
> >>> root       593  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S    17:20   0:00
> >>> [ips-adjust]
> >>> root       594  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        D    17:20   0:00
> >>> [ips-monitor]
> >>>
> >>> If the module isn't loaded, the load of the machine in idle mode is 0 as
> >>> expected.  
> >>
> >> This is a reporting problem, and probably due to the schedule() call
> >> and associated task state in the ips-monitor thread.  I thought setting
> >> the task state to interruptible would prevent this, but it seems like
> >> it's not enough for the deferrable on-stack timers?
> >>
> >> At any rate, it's not actually causing increased CPU usage, so you can
> >> safely ignore it until we have a fix.
> > 
> > Oops, one task uses interruptible correctly, but the monitor thread
> > doesn't.
> > 
> > Does this patch fix your load average?
> 
> The patch works fine:
> 
> ps aux | grep ips
> root     22427  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S    19:15   0:00
> [ips-adjust]
> root     22428  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S    19:15   0:00
> [ips-monitor]

Great, thanks for testing.  I'll get the fix over to Matthew.

> btw: what does this mean (first line):
> 
> 
> kernel: [ 6610.030205] intel ips 0000:00:1f.6: CPU TDP doesn't match
> expected value (found 25, expected 29)

Each SKU has a default TDP.  In your case that's 29W.  But the BIOS can
override that value with a lower one if the platform (chassis, board,
fans, etc) isn't designed to dissipate the full amount.


-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/