linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Emit clearer message for sys_perf_event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:26:41 -0600
From:	David Ahern <daahern@...co.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
CC:	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
	paulus@...ba.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Emit clearer message for sys_perf_event_open
 ENOENT return



On 03/25/11 12:08, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:05:50PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
>> Resend of patch sent back in January 2011 in light of recent confusion around
>> unsupported events for a given platform.
>>
>> Improve sys_perf_event_open ENOENT return handling in top and record, just
>> like 5a3446b does for stat.
>>
>> Retry of Arnaldo's patch using error instead of die which allows the fallback
>> from hardware cycles to software clock.
> 
> Please use ui__warning(""...) as it will work in the TUI too.

error() is consistent with current pattern. Is ui__warning the
preference for new messages? Is that for perf-top only?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/