linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] watchdog: fix nv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTikLSVpw73r_g++_oRs=nTjYf5WmH=XNjjp8o5uo@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:42:36 -0700
From:	Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: fix nv_tco section mismatch

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
>
> Fix section mismatch warning:
> Mark the called nv_tco_getdevice() as __devinit, just like its caller.

This looks fine.

I can't seem to reproduce the warning on my end however, compiling
this as a built-in nor as a module.  How do I trigger a difference
between __init and __devinit?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/