[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1301164168.2250.370.camel@laptop>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:29:28 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH,RFC] perf: panic due to inclied cpu context task_ctx
value
On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 18:35 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 03/26, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > On 03/26, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
> > > index c75925c..e9e4e35 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/perf_event.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
> > > @@ -1073,6 +1073,8 @@ event_sched_out(struct perf_event *event,
> > > if (!is_software_event(event))
> > > cpuctx->active_oncpu--;
> > > ctx->nr_active--;
> > > + if (!ctx->nr_active && cpuctx->task_ctx == ctx)
> > > + cpuctx->task_ctx = NULL;
> >
> > If we clear cpuctx->task_ctx, we should also clear ctx->is_active.
Right.
> > Otherwise I can't see any problem, but I do not understand this code
> > enough.
>
> but probably we also need update_context_time().
It looks like event_sched_out() relies on up-to-date ctx->time through
perf_event_time() and most call-paths leading to event_sched_out() do
indeed seem to update the ctx time, all except the move_group branch in
perf_event_open() afaict.
Sadly the reproducer doesn't seem to trigger the issue at all, its still
running on a plain -tip kernel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists