[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103261428200.25375@router.home>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 14:30:33 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
tj@...nel.org, npiggin@...nel.dk, rientjes@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: Disable the lockless allocator
Indeed I can reproduce it easily.
With a few printk's this shows that alloc_percpu() returns a wrong
address which is the cause of all of this:
logs:
Memory: 1011444k/1048564k available (11622k kernel code, 452k absent,
36668k reserved, 6270k data, 1028k init)
alloc_kmem_cache_cpus kmem_cache_node = ffff88003ffcf000
alloc_kmem_cache_cpus kmem_cache = ffff88003ffcf020
This means that the cpu_slab is not a percpu pointer.
Now the first allocation attempt:
Slab kmem_cache cpu_slab=ffff88003ffcf020 freelist=ffff88003f8020c0
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff87ffc1fdc020
IP: [<ffffffff812c3852>] this_cpu_cmpxchg16b_emu+0x2/0x1c
Tejun: Whats going on there? I should be getting offsets into the per cpu
area and not kernel addresses.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists