[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin8jHz0a5oS4LWQCrYW2VDb9A0V2aL7O5dYaPBt@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 12:30:36 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org, npiggin@...nel.dk,
rientjes@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: Disable the lockless allocator
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
>
> Right. RSI should be in the range of the values you printed.
> However, the determination RSI is independent of the emulation of the
> instruction. If RSI is set wrong then we should see these failures on
> machines that do not do the instruction emulation. A kvm run with Ingo's
> config should show the same issues. Will do that now.
I bet it's timing-dependent and/or dependent on some code layout
issue. Why else would the totally pointless previous patch have made
any difference for Ingo (the "SLUB: Write to per cpu data when
allocating it" thing seems to be pure voodoo programming)?
That said, this early in the boot I don't think we should have any
parallelism going on, so I don't see what could make those kinds of
random effects.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists