[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D8F5186.5030109@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:02:30 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 17/23] arm: at91: Cleanup irq chip
Hello.
On 26-03-2011 0:03, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Avoid the whole lazy disable dance in the demux handler by providing a
>> irq_disable() callback.
>> Use the proper accessor functions and tidy up gpio_irq_handler()
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner<tglx@...utronix.de>
[...]
>> Index: linux-2.6-tip/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
>> +++ linux-2.6-tip/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
[...]
>> @@ -384,16 +385,14 @@ static struct irq_chip gpio_irqchip = {
>> static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
>> {
>> unsigned pin;
>> - struct irq_desc *gpio;
>> - struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio;
>> - void __iomem *pio;
>> + struct irq_data *idata = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
>> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_data_get_chip(data);
>> + struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = irq_data_get_chip_data(data);
> Sorry, needs to be
> + struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> Will fix and resend.
You also don't have 'data' defined anywhere, maybe you meant 'ídata'?
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists