[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103271747360.31464@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:47:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 17/23] arm: at91: Cleanup irq chip
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 26-03-2011 0:03, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > > Avoid the whole lazy disable dance in the demux handler by providing a
> > > irq_disable() callback.
>
> > > Use the proper accessor functions and tidy up gpio_irq_handler()
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner<tglx@...utronix.de>
> [...]
>
> > > Index: linux-2.6-tip/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6-tip/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
> [...]
> > > @@ -384,16 +385,14 @@ static struct irq_chip gpio_irqchip = {
> > > static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> > > {
> > > unsigned pin;
> > > - struct irq_desc *gpio;
> > > - struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio;
> > > - void __iomem *pio;
> > > + struct irq_data *idata = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> > > + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_data_get_chip(data);
> > > + struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = irq_data_get_chip_data(data);
>
> > Sorry, needs to be
>
> > + struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>
> > Will fix and resend.
>
> You also don't have 'data' defined anywhere, maybe you meant 'ídata'?
I know, the compiler already slapped me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists