lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110329084009.GA29874@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:40:10 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: Propagate uA_load requirements up supply
 chain

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 09:28:48AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 08:53:11AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > That's pretty much what I said, yes.

> No, you said the power will map through but the current will not.  I'm
> saying that the power will *not* map through either.

I said that even with a perfectly efficient regulator the current won't
map through, and that physical regulators make things even less direct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ