lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:18:04 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
CC:	Shyam_Iyer@...l.com, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
	Narendra_K@...l.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	Matt_Domsch@...l.com, Charles_Rose@...l.com,
	Jordan_Hargrave@...l.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig

On 03/28/11 18:55, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> writes:
> 
>>> I don't get this.. you should not be getting CONFIG_NLS=m unless you
>>> have stripped you config files really.. :-) Is it possible to get
>>> your .config to hit this issue.
>>
>> I haven't stripped any config files -- but they are randconfig files.
>> Two (2) config files that cause build failures are attached.
> 
> config PCI_IOAPIC
> 	bool
> 	depends on PCI
> 	depends on ACPI
> 	depends on HOTPLUG
> 	default y
> 
> select NLS if (DMI || ACPI)

Ugh.  That looks seriously mucked up.
Dell people, have you checked what it is linux-next for this pci-label stuff?

Jesse, I would drop the b0rked pieces and ask for a new patch.


> I guess this is simply wrong. It will be parsed as
> 
> config PCI_IOAPIC
> 	bool
> 	depends on PCI
> 	depends on ACPI
> 	depends on HOTPLUG
> 	default y
> 	select NLS if (DMI || ACPI)
> 
> How about something like the following?
> 
> config PCI_LABEL
> 	bool
>         select NLS
>         depends on (DMI || ACPI)

What sets/enables it then?
or did you mean:
	def_bool y
and in that case, should it be a user-visible & user-changeable kconfig option?

-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ