[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D924966.2050707@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:04:38 -0400
From: Neil Leeder <nleeder@...eaurora.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...oldbits.com>
CC: Sheetal Sahasrabudhe <sheetals@...eaurora.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>, will.deacon@....com,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, jamie.iles@...ochip.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: accessing vfpinstr macros from outside vfp directory
(Resending: forgot to add Russell to To: list; subject change to avoid it getting lost in
code review thread, was Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] [ARM] perfevents: Add support for Scorpion
performance monitors)
Russell,
On 3/16/2011 5:13 AM, Jean Pihet wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Sheetal Sahasrabudhe
> <sheetals@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> Hi Will/Jean,
>>
>> On Mon, March 14, 2011 6:35 pm, Bryan Huntsman wrote:
>>> On 03/09/2011 09:16 AM, Sheetal Sahasrabudhe wrote:
>>>> This commit adds support for performance monitors provided by
>>>> Qualcomm Scorpion and ScorpionMP processor to perfevents.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sheetal Sahasrabudhe<sheetals@...eaurora.org>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet<j-pihet@...com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon<will.deacon@....com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/include/asm/perf_event.h | 2 +
>>>> arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 11 +
>>>> arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_msm.c | 679 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 3 files changed, 692 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_msm.c
>>>>
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_msm.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_msm.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..4e42f27
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_msm.c
>> [...]
>>
>>>> +#include<asm/vfp.h>
>>>> +#include<asm/system.h>
>>>> +#include "../vfp/vfpinstr.h"
>>>
>>> Sorry I didn't see this earlier. Is there another way to get the info
>>> you need that wouldn't use a relative include path? If the info from
>>> vfpinstr.h is now needed outside of the vfp directory, can it be moved
>>> to a common header instead? Thanks.
> Good catch! Sorry I did not catch this one while reviewing the code.
>
>>>
>>> - Bryan
>>
>> I see other files under vfp that include this header.
>> So if we were to implement Bryan's suggestion, I think a separate patch that moves the
header and updates all the depdendencies would be more appropriate.
>> Are you okay with the relative include path for vfpinstr.h in this patch for now or
would you want to see an update to move vfpinstr.h to include/asm?.
>
> Adding Russell and Nicolas for the VFP question.
> Only fmrx and fmxr are used from "../vfp/vfpinstr.h". Can those be
> moved to arch/arm/include/asm/vfp.h?
>
> What is the best solution to this?
>
> Regards,
> Jean
>
Any opinions on what would be the best thing to do here? Choices appear to be:
1) allow the relative include path of ../vfp/vfpinstr.h
2) move the definitions of fmrx, fmxr from vfp/vfpinstr.h to include/asm/vfp.h
3) move vfp/vfpinstr.h to include/asm
4) other...?
If it helps, I can create a patch for whichever is considered the preferred solution.
Thanks,
Neil (Standing in temporarily for Sheetal while she is on leave of absence)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sheetal
>>
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists