linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] POWER: perf_event: Skip updating kernel counters if register value shrinks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1301433165.2402.689.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:12:45 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>
Cc:	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	acme@...stprotocols.net, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, anton@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] POWER: perf_event: Skip updating kernel counters if
 register value shrinks

On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 10:25 -0400, Eric B Munson wrote:
> Here I made the assumption that the hardware would never remove more events in
> a speculative roll back than it had added.  This is not a situation I
> encoutered in my limited testing, so I didn't think underflow was possible.  I
> will send out a V2 using the signed 32 bit delta and remeber to CC stable
> this time. 

I'm not thinking about underflow but rollover... or that isn't possible
with those counters ? IE. They don't wrap back to 0 after hitting
ffffffff ?

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/