[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=tyhbb54iHPpPjK4+jM09SQv4giOTjpsjvD33E@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:07:09 +0100
From: Maxin John <maxin.john@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
naveen yadav <yad.naveen@...il.com>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: kmemleak for MIPS
Hi Eric,
> Hmm, then MIPS kmemleak port might have a problem with percpu data ?
>
> fcp->hash_table = kzalloc_node(sz, GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
>
> fcp is a per cpu "struct flow_cache_percpu"
Thank you very much for the inputs. I will definitely investigate this.
However, I think, the "basic" kmemleak support for MIPS is working as
expected with the present patch.
The kmemleak test case is also working as expected in MIPS target.
So, as Daniel mentioned, shall we go ahead with integrating the
kmemleak support for MIPS ?
Please let me know your comments.
Cheers,
Maxin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists